The decision by MSNBC and its owner GE (Comcast is currently finalizing the purchase of MSNBC) to suspend Keith Olbermann without pay signals the start of a purge of liberal-leaning commentators from the so-called “mainstream media.” With an activist right-wing Supreme Court, corporate media owners can, without fear of successful legal suits, prune from their trees anybody who speaks for limits on corporate power and against the redistribution of wealth upwards.  With a blood red House of Representatives, the masters of media know that no legislative response to their fiat will be forthcoming.  Some have questioned Comcast’s decision to “suspend” MSNBC’s most popular host and one of NBC’s most versatile broadcasters. Why, these naifs ask, would Comcast act against the best interests of its shareholders? The answer is simple: Olbermann provides a cogent and compelling response to the right-wing in a mostly arid (Fox News and extreme radio excepted) media landscape.  Clearing him (and presumably Rachel and Ed) from the field now will remove potential thorns from the side of the Republican presidential candidate in 2012 – a candidate who will make John McCain look positively decent and who, if elected, will with the acquiescence of a Republican House and Senate 1) remove any barriers to media consolidation and fabrication and 2) keep the income tax rates applicable to GE’s and Comcast’s multi-millionaire managers obscenely low.

Update: A 3rd reason to believe that silencing liberal voices in advance of 2012 was behind the decision is Comcast’s very heavy involvement in the internet.   A Republican Congress and President will almost certainly deregulate the internet leaving Comcast with a free hand to speed downloads of favored clients websites and (as mentioned earlier) to gobble up other internet service providers.  See http://thinkprogress.org/2010/11/05/burke-comcast-msnbc/.

This entry was posted in Hal's Commentary. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Olbermann!

  1. Pingback: Olbermann! | Krxa 540 Am

  2. Tim says:

    A broader point that nobody seems to be discussing is that Comcast is a service provider and they are gaining controlling interest in a content company. Prior to enactment of the Telecommunications act of 1996 this would have been disallowed by law. The Olbermann affair points up exactly why information delivery companies should never be allowed to own content companies and why those laws used to exist. Comcast is truly in a “Big Brother” position and with the defeat of net neutrality will have an effective monopoly on information content and delivery. Efforts should be made by public advocates to blow up the NBC/Comcast merger and repeal the more egregious aspects of the Telecom act of 1996.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *